reply on: Way Too Early NBA Power Ranking \ stacker news ~Stacker

pull down to refresh

42 sats \ 9 replies \ @BlokchainB 6h \ on: Way Too Early NBA Power Ranking Stacker_Sports

Knicks 7? Really? This list is pitiful

60 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 6h

I can't tell if you're upset because they're too high or too low.

42 sats \ 7 replies \ @BlokchainB 6h

Too low

52 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 6h

I could see putting them ahead of the Cavs, but I think the best four teams are in the West.

42 sats \ 5 replies \ @BlokchainB 6h

Knicks > Warriors

137 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 5h

I agree. Warriors too high.

53 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 5h

I'll wait until they secure whichever 40 year old they're going to land, but then I'll happily consider a wager that they win their series with the Knicks this year.

reply on another page

88 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 6h

I'm half baking in that Horford is going there, or maybe Lebron.

89 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 5h

Lebron to warriors would be intriguing

view all 1 replies