pull down to refresh

Is there a way to anonymize the origin or use of BTC?
Yes, coinjoin. Currently, self-proclaimed authorities on taint - we call those spooks - are preemptively flagging all coinjoined utxo as suspect. So, I'm mixing everything I get to make the set of coins with mixing in their history as large as I can personally can help. Two things can happen:
  1. The total number of coins that is tradable on centralized exchanges keeps shrinking. This helps NgU.
  2. It becomes unmanageable for them and they have to give in, which means fungibility wins
Either way, bitcoiners win.
Either way, bitcoiners win.
Only if you can begin using the “tainted” coinjoined coins, which, to my understanding are being blocked from being used. You lose everything else. Do you call that winning?
reply
122 sats \ 4 replies \ @anon 13h
‘Tainted Bitcoin’ does not exist. It is a 100% complete utter myth. Anyone who says otherwise has not bought/sold bitcoin peer to peer, or used it to buy things (especially with lightning).
Privacy is another issue… and something that Bitcoin can struggle with. But in terms of fungibility all Bitcoin is the same.
reply
How is that when they can shutdown addresses and stop transactions for those addresses? Each BTC or sat is identified as it is used and put on the blockchain, isn’t it?
reply
219 sats \ 2 replies \ @anon 13h
There is zero evidence they can ‘stop transactions’ with addresses. When the individual owns their own keys they own their bitcoin… no one can stop the transactions and there are tons of transaction miners could ‘censor’ and they dont. Its impossible to seize bitcoin you don’t have the keys for that’s the entire point.
Identified? So when a sat ‘moves’ from one part of the world to another… it’s identified? How? If I receive ‘sats’ in a lightning channel and you don’t know who I am… or where I am how can you trace the bitcoin??
It’s impossible.
reply
OK, I’ll take your word for it. I just wonder what happened to Ross’ BTC. Did he surrender them to the state by coughing up his keys? How did they track it down and take it away?
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 11h
Either surrendered, or bad security so it was just taken from records, i.e. an unencrypted key on a device or piece of paper.
10 sats \ 6 replies \ @optimism 18h
You're only being blocked from exchanges and the like. If you hire me, feel free to pay me with tainted coin, because the taint is BS.
reply
I think the taint is BS, too. However, when they are blocking and freezing ”tainted” accounts, the BTC cannot be moved around. In other words, the exchanges are working as arms of the state! Now, to find a way to get amounts of BTC off of the exchanges and in circulation anonymously.
reply
20 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 18h
There aren't accounts in Bitcoin. They cannot "freeze" your coin. This is not Ethereum.
Now, to find a way to get amounts of BTC off of the exchanges and in circulation anonymously.
Just withdraw over LN and cycle the channel.
reply
That is good news. Are you sure that there are no accounts? Isn’t an address the same thing as an account, only with a different name? Can’t they freeze addresses?
reply
Yes, I am sure.
Recommended reading:
Can’t they freeze addresses?
No. This is why we say "not your keys, not your coin", and as long as "they" don't have the key, it's not their coin.