pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 23 Jun \ parent \ on: Announcement: new Zerolink coinjoin coordinator bitcoin
Thanks for sharing.
If this bug were patched, that would increase privacy and anonymity , yes?
write
preview
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @DarthCoin 23 Jun
again... whirpool is useless. Use LN.
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 23 Jun
Why is it useless?
reply
21 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 23 Jun
Because now we have LN and is much better. Just think about this simple fact: through a single 1M sats channel I can coinjoin/ mix/ /whirlpool/whatever you want to call it... infinite amount of sats without any onchain trace.
If you do not realize how powerful is this, you still have a lot to learn about LN.
Coinjoin onchain is a matter of the past, from the pre-LN era...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @klk 25 Jun
It hurt's to pay 0.1% + 0.5% in fee to Boltz when swapping “large” amounts though. Much cheaper with JoinMarket.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 23 Jun
Is receiving privacy on Lightning still non-existent or has that been fixed somehow? I know you have good sending privacy on lightning but invoices reveal the receiving node to the sender and to all relaying nodes, right?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @klk 25 Jun
https://lnproxy.org/ and BOLT12 are your friends.
BTW the relaying nodes don't know the receiving node.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 23 Jun
Yes, there is always so much more for me to learn.
How can you mix an infinite amount of sats through a 1 million Sat channel?
reply