Yes, but not fee-less. Things like roads, trash pickup, water, security all require continual fees.

This is ultimately why I settled back to "small gov constitutional libertarian-ism" as the most practical form of achievable government. Anarcho Capitalism is nice in theory but in practice we come to resemble "small gov" anyway.

A fairly difficult issue, considering that:

If they can print all the role they want or need, because they also require your taxes? 🤔

Sure, but I wouldn't want to live there.

Government is the structure we evolved to do the things that require collective resources and decision-making. You don't get that without funding it.

A thriving society requires a government with the resources it needs to fulfill its mission. If we want a society full of awesome people doing awesome things, we need to ensure everybody has access to an education. If we want to live in a just society, we need to make sure nobody goes hungry. There are so many things that don't get done without collective investment (mass transit, for example). These are all great things to have in society, and they don't get solved without taxes.

It is possible for society to be taxless if country has enough revenue from other things other than tax.

It’s possible in theory, but very difficult in practice. A society without taxes would need to fund public services—like roads, security, healthcare, or education—in other ways, like voluntary contributions, user fees, or profits from state-owned enterprises. But history shows that without some kind of regular, collective funding system, it's hard to maintain shared infrastructure and basic services fairly. So while “taxless” sounds appealing, it often ends up shifting the costs in less transparent ways—or weakening the things everyone relies on.

The most difficult problem to solve without some form of non consensual value extraction is the free rider problem.

Simple and non consequential example would be street lighting. You can't exclude people yhat don't pay from benefitting from it and so you are incentivising people not paying for it. (So you may have situation where 95% of the people want something and will pay money for it, but the thing does not occur because of this problem.) And there are way more consequential examples.

Yes. There’s a good number of things that already are paid for with voluntary service fees added by private entities but it would be nothing like our existing societies. The nation state cannot effectively be compared to a free society.

If it has protection from roving bandits, sure.

Taxes are the slow looting of a stationary bandit that protects its turf against roving bandits. That's even the conventional mainstream account of how the state originated. It has nothing to do with collective action problems or social contracts.

The US didn't have a federal personal income tax until 1913

Yes, it's possible!! But that government or society must embrace Bitcoin and leave fiat money aside!! In order to live with true financial freedom!!