pull down to refresh

As the language of Marxism becomes increasingly disguised in moralistic slogans such as “social justice” and “inclusiveness,” many people fail to recognize Marxist theories when they encounter them. They expect theories derived from Marxism to be littered with red flag phrases like “dialectical materialism” or “class conflict,” which would be the dead giveaway that they are dealing with Marxist interpretations. In the absence of such phrases, they deny that social justice theories are Marxist at all. …
Constant adjustment in pursuit of individual ends and goals is key to understanding human action. According to Mises, “In the course of social events there prevails a regularity of phenomena to which man must adjust his action if he wishes to succeed.”
But how can man “wish to succeed” in the first place, much less “adjust his action” accordingly, if he is merely some kind of automaton responding to the stimulus of his material circumstances? According to Marxists, there are certain predetermined actions that will inevitably be adopted by people who are classified as “exploited” and other actions will always be adopted by their “exploiters.” To Marxists, man does not adjust his actions based on his personal preferences or his own agency but merely follows the collective dictates of his group. By viewing everyone’s actions as determined by their group, it immediately becomes self-evident what their choices must be in every situation—you know what a white person would choose, what a slave would do in any situation, etc. …
There are many problems with this reasoning, but the key point being highlighted here is that it denies the very notion of free will and individual choice. As Mises explains:
Marxism asserts that a man’s thinking is determined by his class affiliation. Every social class has a logic of its own. The product of thought cannot be anything else than an “ideological disguise” of the selfish class interests of the thinker. …
Rejecting these irrational theories, Mises argues that “what distinguishes man from beasts is precisely that he adjusts his behavior deliberately. Man is the being that has inhibitions, that can master his impulses and desires.” Human action is deliberate and masterful, not simply determined by one’s history, race, or class. Human action and human choices are not prescribed by the dominant ideology or by prevailing power structures, but by individual will and agency.
This is the very core of Misesian theory and the Austrian school and is the polar opposite of the Marxian theories of human behavior in all fields. We are rational beings making, for our personal situation, rational choices, at all times. We do not work against ourselves when we make these decisions and we do not make them on blind impulse of instinct or class or race conscience because for humans there is no such thing. The Marxian theory is there for built upon a foundation of quicksand and requires the progressive/lefty/collectivist/Marxist/socialist/communist/murderers to practice thier final solutions to all their problems and thinking. How can people in good conscience follow this sort of theory and thinking?
There’s definitely a tendency in Marxist theory to overemphasize structural forces while downplaying individual agency. But reducing all human behavior to class struggle or material conditions ends up stripping people of personal responsibility—and that’s dangerous. It’s one thing to recognize the influence of systems; it’s another to pretend people are just puppets with no will. Human beings are moral agents, not cogs in a historical machine.
reply
Yes, but the whole idea behind Marxism is to collectivize humanity into one amorphous blob that can be pruned and massaged as needed to get it into the shape that is desired. It is hugely damaging to any kind of personal responsibility or choice. It subsumes the desires of the slaves. serfs or subjects citizens into the plans of the state. We have seen how this works, haven’t we? We can also see how it is being actively applied in the UK, for example, can’t we. Poison is poison no matter how you disguise it or rename it.
reply
As someone who grew up in Cuba, I don’t need to read theory to understand what happens when Marxist ideas are taken to their full conclusion. I’ve seen firsthand how the individual is crushed under the weight of “the collective.” You’re right—it erases personal responsibility and turns people into obedient parts of a machine they didn’t choose to be in. The rhetoric always sounds noble: equality, justice, solidarity... but the reality is fear, scarcity, surveillance, and the silencing of dissent. Marxism doesn’t just misunderstand human nature—it actively tries to reengineer it. And the result is always the same: suffering.
reply
Yes, the whole system is to engineer massive suffering into society for the benefit of the Party Leaders!! The Castros are wealthy beyond our wildest imaginations, aren’t they. It would also be interesting to see who else backed the Castro regime in Cuba and financed it to get it going, wouldn’t it? The one thing you always hear from the progressive/lefty/collectivist/Marxist/socialist/communist/murderers is that the communism/socialism was not applied hard or pure enough to reach the desired utopia conditions, so lets try harder next time. Are we the next time?
reply
In reality, little is said about the fact that it was the United States and the CIA who financed Fidel, that the same former Cuban president before Batista gave him money and weapons in Mexico, and that as soon as the revolution triumphed, Fidel went to the USA first. These are very interesting things in history, and as Trotsky himself said, in order for communism to survive it must be exported to other states in order to be able to drink from them.
reply
Ah, yes! But, who in the CIA, MI6 and the other organizations are the ones doing the persuasive work to get the financing and backing. My suspicion is that it is the same people who backed the Bolsheviks (who were actually not the majority but a small minority, otherwise usually labeled Mensheviks, but history was rewritten) backed Castro. Their outer cover is CIA, MI6 and others but who are they really?