Liberation.travel

What if the government only allows you to use BTC that are "compliant", and for them to be that way they have to be at an address with a covenant that limits how you can move your utxo, those limits are not set by you. It's just a possibility... But without a doubt, anything that limits or restricts your ability to move your utxos freely must be considered with great caution. In any case I am not against it, I would simply like to understand all the implications that this would have.

I need to look at the details, but my biggest concern with whatever proposal of covenants is that by setting conditions they can limit or even prevent you from having control over your addresses. Edge cases and "creative" censorship can happen.

There are a prNIP-302 about relay pools, that maybe can fits with what you are thinking about 🤔 https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1035

Wow 👀

I had another idea about this topic, using bip32 on nostr. Maybe it can be complemented with nip05... but maybe not necessary. Ill publish the proposal soon TM 🤙

Hahaha 🎯

Much more, and i think people would appreciate more and more its cryptographic nature and decentralized soul when enshittification evolves

The memory of Aaron Swartz its present in all of us 💜

Do you know the community of Málaga 2140?

Pastafarism and ... Pastafarism

Keep working on nostee.me 💪

List its fuking loong

little less than 10k

Maybe, but this would be treated as two separate profiles together, not as a unified profile. I've recently been thinking about how to solve natively in nostr a way to do 'multisig'. But I haven't come to any interesting conclusions yet

The only solutions as far i know are nsecbunker and key delegation

Its very mobile frienly by the moment. You mean pwa?

Not yet, its in the roadmap⚡