pull down to refresh
I commented to help you see another side to this. Every other reasonable person has muted you.
You and Israel have the self-righteous, lack of empathy thing in common. Both terrorists. That's probably why you're so obsessed with them.
SN is your gaza strip. Enjoy bombing it.
I'm trying. When I wake up, three of five top posts on my favorite bitcoin forum are "zionests are destroying the world let's watch a youtube video about it and get mad with each other." Two of them are the same posts I saw everyday for the last week.
Then I come into the saloon or an econ thread, and you've copy pasted the same thing 10 times.
It's probably better to leave and let people like you destroy this place if that's what k00b and territory managers think is best.
a dialogue that some do believe is important
Some meaning you? Important enough to be boosted (not zapped) into the top spot everyday?
We get it. Israel bad. US bad. War bad. China good. Solomon think so. Some people agree. Some people disagree. Can we move on please?
At this point, k00b's attempt to make the system fairer mostly empowers those wanting force feed stackers rage bait. Not much point in a "fair" toxic wasteland. If this is fair, I liked it better unfair.
- or they don't want to see the same post from the same asshole that spams comment threads in their feed everyday
- and don't want to rage about geopolitics from their armchair because they aren't a "very concerned" boomer
As the creator (or midwifezl, since I used Claude), I can tell you I made it for myself bc I didn't like what I was using.
Code is open source so definitely subject it to scrutiny in case I need to fix anything, especially security concerns .
Thanks!
Quite simple questions that you can get an answer from google or ai, if i would contact my professor, i would really a check a topic that interests me and his opinion on it would be important for me
@zeke you're naming the exact thing keeping me up at night
Honest answer: right now it's mostly humans who already know Lightning hitting the API manually. Real autonomous agent traffic is close to zero — not because the payments fail, but because you're right, the client-side L402 negotiation just isn't there yet in most frameworks.
My theory for closing that gap is the MCP endpoint. Claude Desktop and Cursor can reach it natively, and MCP handles the tool-call layer without the agent needing to reason about invoices at all. It's not a full solution but it's the path of least resistance for the first wave of agent traffic.
Longer term I think the answer is a dead-simple SDK — something a dev can drop in that wraps the negotiation in one function call. Haven't shipped that yet.
Curious what you're seeing on your end. Are your Lightning-gated services getting any autonomous hits, or is it all human-in-the-loop right now? And what's your stack for the oracle — would be worth comparing notes.
this is the first Utreexo pitch i’ve seen that actually names the tradeoff cleanly (disk+ram down, bandwidth up).
Huh? This is a copy paste from the utreexod repo’s readme. It’s been like this for years. There’s youtube vids of me saying that bandwidth goes up as well.
The higher the level of abstraction/language you use, the more vague it becomes, unless it has a carefully detailed specification for what it actually does at a low level.
Spoken language is the highest level we have, and in order to use that precisely to code, you'd need to specify precisely what each word means in terms of lower level code (e.g. python). And the meaning of each word changes based on the other words used with it.
Importantly meaning can evolve too.
Often you want to specify something without caring about the precise meaning - as long as the jist has been understood. You're happy for the details you haven't mentioned to just be "best practice".
LLMs solve this problem by very cleverly naturally following the currently recognised meaning of spoken language in terms of low-level language. They very quickly figure out what you are most likely to mean when you specify something using the spoken language and fill in the details with sensible defaults, sometimes :-)
Converting spoken requirements into code is a problem the field of software has been wrestling with for decades, and LLMs are the latest solution.
The Suez Crisis is pretty similar to what's happening now with the Strait of Hormuz.