pull down to refresh
@StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears
1,013,527 sats stacked
stacking since: #440139longest cowboy streak: 413
121 sats \ 1 reply \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 12h \ on: Cigarette filters and other pointless safetyism mostly_harmless
I remember a character in one of Isaac Asimov's Black Widower books (his mystery short stories) griping that diet soda would make someone feel virtuous, and as a result they'd eat more during the meal, and they ended up eating more calories as a result.
Oof. That sucks -- sorry to hear it. But yeah, eliminating everyone in your contact list (wife and offspring excluded, assuming you trust them) is probably the only safe thing to do now.
Google says this will help to cut down on bad actors who hide their identity to distribute malware, commit financial fraud, or steal users’ personal data.
I don't doubt that's true, just like the age requirements in the UK and other places will stop some kids from bad things. But in both cases, it's a baby with the bathwater situation, and getting rid of privacy and security measures for people who need them just sucks. There will always be small niche phones available that will allow full privacy, but Google's half of a two-headed monster in the field, and they've taken so many steps backwards recently.