pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 42m \ on: Starting to lose my patience with Swan bitcoin
What transactions do you see on each side? Has Swan been making unauthorized withdrawals? Or simply they they've been withdrawing from your savings account when it should have been checking?
It seems to me that progressives are digging themselves deeper and deeper into cognitive dissonance because otherwise they'd have to admit that they elected and enabled one of the most incompetent, authoritarian, and war-mongering regimes in recent memory.
Do you have a direct channel to Stacker.News lightning node?
I wrote a beginner guide here: #723978
40 sats \ 3 replies \ @SimpleStacker 21h \ parent \ on: Chaos in the Senate Yesterday Politics_And_Law
So, wait, do Republicans want to be present or absent? Politics is complicated.
Would have been interesting to see this normalized to population, and also going back to the 70s when the "war on drugs" started
Yeah... I was a Physics major in college but went to grad school for Econ. I never regretted switching fields until SpaceX came along and reignited my imagination for physics!
I work in a business school so most people don't publish in Nature and aren't familiar with these nuances. I think if I could get one in, people would automatically be super impressed, even if it's "Scientific Reports" lol.
Stacker.News is truly impressive. This post stacked over 100k sats which is over $92 USD, for a person simply sharing their deep thoughts.
Great post, too, by the way. As I mentioned in #770966, SN seems to be doing a good job incentivizing zapping and elevating good posts to the top.
Interesting. I didn't know there was a pay-to-publish arm of Nature. Maybe I should try to get an article in lol
Unfortunately, the article didn't really explain the details of his misconduct other than "misrepresentation."
Also interesting that he didn't have tenure. Wonder how hard it would have been to fire him if he did.
I didn't know it was only 272 words. That's impressive. Goes to show that longer writing is not better writing.