pull down to refresh
another thought is whether compression is also harder than generation for humans as well
I think it probably is
yeah just look at the geography of the strait of Hormuz. even just looking at the shape of the landmasses vs the water, it's easy to why you can't take it with naval might alone
I wonder how much their performance depends on the need to reason about state vs reasoning about the code itself?
I feel like LLMs can already do the compression step, you just have to tell them to. I think asking LLMs to clean up my code is actually a task it's pretty well suited for.
The reason it doesn't do this by default (vs humans) is that humans can maintain longer context and read between the lines of the specific task instructions, whereas LLMs take your task instructions quite literally and do not consider wider context than that
This is great. I'd suggest not couching it in terms of "the founders' take" or "OP's take", though, as it sounds a little like they're splitting the same pot.
If most of a territory's earnings are going to the founder/operator, then it means that the people posting in those territories are paying higher posting costs but not necessarily getting a lot of zaps. Not quite the same as "founders have a higher take"
As a coffee drinker, this look really enticing. 1 pound seems like a lot, but worth it to support a bitcoin company.
Any recipe suggestions for combining with coffee? Would pouring over the chocolate and honey without adding milk or blending work? I don't have a working blender right now and not interested in adding milk.
I don't know you, but honestly I don't think anyone on stacker News could do worse than the congressmen we currently have. Good luck!
Fair on the first point, but as to the euphemism, it doesn't really matter what you think; they're gonna point their guns at you and take your money to bail out other peoples' bad decisions regardless. So, a case could be made that I'd rather them point their guns at the people making bad decisions to force them to stop making those bad decisions.
The only thing I'll add though is that peoples' bad decisions genuinely cause an externality. For example, if they turn towards theft or fraud to cover their gambling debts. Or even what I call the "moral externality"... in a democratic society people vote to use public money to help those who are struggling, even if their struggles are entirely their own fault.
I mean that's one of the interpretations right? that they get targeted for sexual scandal because it lets others wield power over them
it's more a sense that public officials and the political class more generally have a high correlation to being surrounded by sexual scandals, even if not actively engaged themselves. Kristi Noems husband was just in the news for one.
It could simply be a reporting bias, obviously, but it could also be real
seems plausible
and besides kompromat, it could be a "one of us" effect, like how if you show your dark side some people will actually trust you more
Is there a correlation between sexual degeneracy and holding public office?
Maybe some weird attraction to power?
Why not be honest with your kids? You can tell them you don't believe it, but you want them to decide for themselves, while raising them in an environment that you acknowledge has positive resources for mental health, as well as not being inherently irrational or unreasonable?
The one thing I'll add is, given what you shared about your background -- I wonder if your expression of faith was narrowly tied to social justice action. Caring for the poor is part of the faith, but if that's your primary engagement with it, then it makes sense that when you lose that, you lose a lot of what the whole thing meant to you.
Ok, I'll add two things. From my casual observation, the percent of Christians in the bitcoin world seems a bit higher than in the non-bitcoin world. Take that how you will, but I do think it says something about how religion isn't inherently a scam the way many other human institutions are.