Ignorance of the law just makes you ignorant

Would you play chess (or any game) and ignore the rules?

if it depends on someone else, it's not a right

you are talking about privileges

it just means murica is now a shitcoincracy

Once the confrontation is over, collect your evidence and any witnesses present. You are now ready to send the perpetrator your affidavit of status, affidavit of fact, notice of liability and notice of claim.

Spend the money wisely.

Matthew 6:24

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/ https://www.biblegateway.com/

All these pills are based in Great Britain " I do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will, to the best of my skill and knowledge, discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law."

..and in theese books https://www.thesovereignproject.live/books

One thing is similar everywhere: If you are responsable (able to respond), the officers (should) protect you. if you are not responsable, they protect others from you.

Where this altercation ultimately ends up depends on too many variables at this point to give a definitive series of steps, however doing the following would be extremely advantageous to you.

A police presence may have been in effect at the very beginning of this remedy set up, or they may have been called in after the initial contact with the person making the fraudulent claim.

You may be talking to the police directly, or they may be there as an impartial observer, although if they are still identifying as a “police officer”, they are NOT impartial.

Before entering into any remedy set up, you will already know the difference between a police officer and a constable of the law.

Whenever a police officer is present, you must get his identity and get him on his oath right from the beginning.

Once the police officer has been put on his oath, he is no longer a police officer, but a constable who has sworn an oath to uphold the law and protect your rights.

Now you can use them to protect you against any third party making fraudulent claims against you; if they fail in their duty, they are no longer a constable and are now open to a counterclaim from you, for a criminal act made against you, either directly or indirectly through negligence of duty.

They developed their own brand of reggae/dub soundsystem music

fear and slave mentality

read darth's guides or it does not get simpler than coinos.io make account, install pwa

the chamber stopped echoing

a shitcoin wallet?

When you are now in the position to ask a hard hitting question against them, they may try and evade the question or ignore it entirely.

Do NOT allow this; you have asked a question, now demand an answer.

At this point you halt the conversation and ask the question again, and this time clearly state that this is the second time you have asked this question.

Give them a forewarning that they only have one more chance to answer as a failed response to the question for a third time will result in default for them, and you will now be well within your rights to answer for them.

Note: Asking a question three times is a maxim of law; it dates back thousands of years.

There is a very real lawful and legal reason why you ask a question three times.

This can be used in a court of law. The defendant cannot make the claim they did not know about the question, if it was asked three times, and it is on the record.

For the same reason this is why an auctioneer will say going once, going twice, three times, gone. The auctioneer has given you three warnings to answer. The hammer goes down, the contract is concluded.