I noticed a group of accounts with the same behavior, it seemed like low effort spam. There is no way to tag a developer and no way to report potential spam otherwise.

Was this not an expected outcome? Jack Mallers has been very open about the fact they are trying to build Strike as legally compliant as they can. Better to release what they can where they can now and expand out when they can later. There are a lot of hoops to jump through.

.

I imagine everyone will create their own "ecosystems" because the name of the game for tech is to vendor lock you into an ecosystem you can't get easily get out of. This is why I have yet to migrate from Google for example. It is less of an ecosystem and more of a prison with no walls where the guard will tell you you're free to leave but when you get half way in the field you realize the prison still has all your things and also now you've been shot in the back.

I don't know how this works but I have a project I have really wanted to do but can't because time and funding. Will try to apply for one of these grants and maybe if I am lucky I can bring the project to life. The project itself isn't too difficult, the difficult part is introducing new products within the project to increase its longevity.

Spam

Spam

Spam

While I am skeptical of a soft landing, I am more skeptical of any narrative from a site that is solely focused on documenting the collapse of the dollar. Fear sells and it does appear this site has things they are trying to sell.

That is not what will happen. Exchanges will face a liquidity crisis and the price will squeeze up. Instead of denominating in whole Bitcoins, exchanges will denominate in Sats by default and the issue of liquidity will be resolved.

We are closer to that point than people might think. When volatile moves happen, you always see exchanges run into different issues like withdrawing. I don't think this is out of malice, I think this is because there is literally no liquidity left and they have to wait for their market makers to get more liquidity.

Even if everyone could only own one Bitcoin, there still isn't enough for "the rest of the population" to own 1 Bitcoin, whoever said that on CNN is a fudtard.