10 sats \ 0 replies \ @BXL909 7 Sep \ on: Diggnation v2.0 Rebooted - Stacker News Live always reminded me of the show. meta
I used to love digg and diggnation back in the day. Thanks for the link :)
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" is a grammatically correct sentence in English.
Something I think would be interesting would be to have a format where you have a single guest per episode - each an owner of a company that crucially doesn't have any bitcoin integration in their business. I don't mean in terms of their treasury or whatever - I mean accepting payment for goods, services, subscriptions or whatever it is there company does.
The interview would be interesting in itself if the right guests were interviewed, but the slant of this show would be to explore why this company doesn't use bitcoin, whether it's considered it, perceived or actual obstacles , etc, perhaps with then exploring possible solutions, correcting misconceptions, and so on.
There could be lessons to learn in terms of development needed for wider adoption, and maybe even the occasional orange-pilling happening on the show
In the end, I decided to incorporate the DCA calculator into my existing app, SATSuma. There's a new DCA screen which visualises your DCA strategy and lets you change frequency, amounts and start/end dates.
The latest version of SATSuma is 2.1, which includes the new DCA screen and a bunch of other stuff, and was released yesterday on halving day!
π I actually tend to agree. Although I want to make a DCA calculator app, I don't DCA. myself. All in once, then stack more whenever I can.
For me, the question should be reversed.... at what price does non-custodial BTC get scary. I don't mind having a bit of loose change in my Wallet of Satoshi, but self-custody regardless of price for anything more than that.
have you tried https://21futures.com/? I'm currently reading it
Iβve only read the first few stories so far but am enjoying it. We definitely need more bitcoin fiction
I've just updated it to v2.01 - a minor display glitch fixed and fees re-labelled to show priority rather that time estimations (thanks for the suggestion @AJ1992)
That would be really nice. Sadly, I wouldn't know how, and I suspect it would have to be built quite differently from the beginning to make it more portable.