pull down to refresh
546 sats \ 0 replies \ @Anonomoto 2 Jan \ on: What is the longest time you have waited for a tx to confirm? bitcoin
Since the 18th of December and counting.
I discovered yesterday that I own an "uncommon" sat, which means I could sell that single sat for $200.
I don't own a Ledger to secure the Bitcoin and will never use a browser wallet extension without HWW, so as much as I'd like a free $200 to buy more Bitcoin with, it's not worth the risk to liberate that single sat out of the UTXO it's in.
I did, however, learn more about Ordinals beyond thinking it's all just jpegs, and I do like the collector element to it, but I also think it's flash-in-the-pan stuff, so I'm neutral mostly.
Once the channel is created, I'll push 95% of the Sats to Boltz.Exchange.
That should maintain the channel capacity and allow for further inbound transactions.
My channel will mostly be for inbound transactions before sweeping out to Boltz; in the future, I'll likely expand the channel when there is a quiet spell in the mempool.
Thanks, appreciated.
I just have to wait for the fees to subside to a level I'm ready to pull the trigger on. The initial deposit is from Muun, and they don't use RBF/CPFP.
So, splicing applies when sending (splicing-out) or receiving (splicing-in) on-chain?
Does splicing-in also apply to LN transactions greater than my channel's current capacity?
And finally, regarding the 'max-fee amount' in the Channel Management tab (iOS), is that the max-fee in sats I'm willing to pay to splice?
You didn’t mention a timeline in your post. 🤷♂️
For now to defer paying main chain fees I’m using Lightning and Liquid to stack and have set alerts for low mempool pressure, where I’ll migrate to cold storage and consolidate UTXOs.
The amounts used in Liquid transactions are private, but the addresses used are visible.
But maybe using something like Sideswap on Liquid once pegged-in breaks that chain. I don't know, but I would love an answer too.