pull down to refresh

@02b58a1376
2,456 sats stacked
stacking since: #860969
bio
8 items
by
for
Gold repricing oddswww.youtube.com/watch?v=RCeWQHATWYU
86 sats \ 0 comments \ @02b58a1376 20 Feb Politics_And_Law
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @02b58a1376 OP 16 Feb \ on: ECB printer loading Politics_And_Law
https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/trumps-nato-spending-demands-could-hit-europes-credit-ratings-says-sp-global-2025-02-14/
S&P looked at three scenarios: the first where European nations increase defence spending to the current NATO GDP-weighted average of 2.67% of GDP; a second where they match the current U.S. level of 3.3%; and a third where it jumps to the 5% of GDP Trump has called for. Scenario one would mean the EU as a whole increasing defence spending by $242 billion a year. In scenario three, it would rise by as much as $875 billion.
Plus NexGen (800b scamdemic "recovery" plan) will also come due starting from 2028:
https://www.eunews.it/en/2025/01/10/post-pandemic-eurobonds-rising-interest-rates-makes-repayment-much-more-expensive-for-the-eu/
It is not just a question of the money lent but also interest. According to preliminary estimates, “the total cost for the period 2028 to 2034, covering both the capital and the interest rates, is now estimated at between €140 billion and €168 billion (current prices) depending on whether repayment is spread with an equal yearly amount or with an equal share of gross national income (GNI).”
All this without considering eventual tariffs.
... BRRRRRRRR
ECB printer loadingwww.reuters.com/world/europe/brussels-exempt-defence-spending-eu-budget-constraints-2025-02-14/
346 sats \ 4 comments \ @02b58a1376 16 Feb Politics_And_Law
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @02b58a1376 13 Feb \ on: Debate: Debt or no Debt - Plan ₿ Forum El Salvador 2025 events
Point is that there is no trustless way of doing it. Not your keys, not your coins, full stop. All this platforms (Ledn, Hodl Hodl, Nexo, Firefish) can go offline at any moment and your freaking precious money are gone. Imho, better to leave speculation to the big guys (Saylor & Co).
90 sats \ 0 replies \ @02b58a1376 OP 5 Feb \ parent \ on: Unexpected fees in Lightning channel open and close (Regtest) lightning
Setting --sat_per_vbyte 0 is like not setting it at all. The parameter is ignored when set to 0. Hence it chooses a fee rate on its own. The lowest you can go with LND is --sat_per_vbyte 1
ah, there it is... Indeed, with --sat_per_vbyte 50 I get the same 6087 sats. Thank you very much!!!
Unexpected fees in Lightning channel open and close (Regtest)
260 sats \ 2 comments \ @02b58a1376 5 Feb lightning
Phoenix Wallet Privacy TradeOffs
614 sats \ 17 comments \ @02b58a1376 26 Jan lightning
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @02b58a1376 23 Jan \ on: How to Borrow Against Your Bitcoin, or: Overcollateralized Loans are Inefficient econ
noob question... can't this be done over lightning? taking as model robosats (no central coordinator, over tor, no email address)
GENESIS