pull down to refresh
@ek
4,816,726 sats stacked
stacking since: #57444longest cowboy streak: 233 verified stacker.news contributornpub16x07c...2j2s96s89dekzyis
Mhh, reading the
createrune
docs, that might indeed be the case:restrictions (one of, optional): It can be the stringreadonly
, or an array of restrictions. Each restriction is an array of one or more alternatives
Will test with v24.11
update: you are right, on v24.11, I need to run this:
$ lightning-cli createrune restrictions='[["method=invoice"]]'
and this throws:
$ lightning-cli createrune restrictions='["method=invoice"]' { "code": -32602, "message": "restrictions: not a valid restriction (should be array): invalid token (see logs for details)" }
Did you use first
'
and then inside "
or the other way around?I also get an error if I run
$ lightning-cli createrune restrictions="['method=invoice']" lightning-cli: Some parameters are malformed, cannot create a valid JSON-RPC request: { "jsonrpc" : "2.0", "method" : "createrune", "id" : "cli:createrune#3018", "params" :{ "restrictions" : ['method=invoice']} }
but I don't if I run
$ lightning-cli createrune restrictions='["method=invoice"]'
It's probably some shell expansion that is consuming the brackets if you use
"
since "
does not disable shell expansion but '
does.I was surprised this was required as we are running behind a Tor hidden service, but okay...
Oh, it shouldn't be required for hidden services but I see in our local dev setup that it throws "socket hang up" if you don't give it a cert. That's a bug!
While I was still in school, I had a therapist that recommended that I write about my thoughts. I was a little disappointed when I realized she would never read what I wrote but I had to tell her about it to discuss it (I wrote a lot). Apparently, the idea was just for me to write it down, not for her to read all of it. She was still great, though.
I wrote, and my words overflowed with intensity and negativity. Through my pen, these feelings transformed into denunciatory texts filled with darkness and dystopia.
I might dig up my old writings on paper. I used pen & paper because that made it feel more important. Almost wrote a book rambling about how cruel the world is haha
Kinda defeats the purpose if opening/closing channels costs thousands of Sats and takes months to be confirmed.
Why would more expensive onchain transactions defeat the purpose of lightning?
With the current block size, if everyone in the world wanted to open and close ONLY A SINGLE Lightning channel per YEAR, it would not be possible.
Yes
Hardly anyone is using it non-custodially as it is.... and you want to make it even more difficult to use?!
You mean make it harder to use it non-custodially? I don't think that the tx fees for channel open/close are the bottleneck for non-custodial usage. It's that you need to run a lightning node and manage channels. More expensive onchain transactions don't change that.
My point is that if bitcoin started with smaller blocks, lightning would maybe already be more developed. Maybe, I obviously don't really know.
SN has proven it’s no less than any other mainstream platform
bans don’t exist on SN
sounds like a contradiction
It took me a while to realize you were also supporting Darth while pretending to be helpful and just advising me to mute the account.
There are usually more than just two sides to something. I agree with him that there are or were many assmilkers here but I don't agree with how Darth is expressing himself. He's like a retarded friend that talks a lot of shit but still has a lot to offer if you ask him for help with bitcoin stuff. It's not that deep.
If you think that me agreeing with Darth on something means I was only pretending to be helpful and have 'shown my true colors,' then you’ve probably already made up your mind because you’ve arbitrarily decided that when I’m nice, I’m not honest, but when I’m not nice, I am.
So I am not going to waste my time trying to convince you otherwise, ...
P. S. Please outlaw me too! :)
... especially if you still accuse us of "censoring", when you surely know that anybody can flag any content. But you're probably also already convinced that anytime something is outlawed, it must have been me or k00b because that fits your view of SN, lol
curl
(but after that, also always the same one withcurl
). I can bypass the cache by adding some random parameter to the URL.